|
"Its not a scam because
Costco refunds your money" |
 |
|
My "Fenway" bed felt to me
like a hammock; not "PosturePedic"! |
|
|
|
That is what a Costco manger told me. I do agree that
Costco refunded my $568 when I returned the "Fenway". |
|

Why do I say it is a scam? Because Sealy is using the
term "PosturePedic" to make people think any piece of junk they
slap together is a good mattress. The word "PosturePedic"
invokes the words "posture" and "orthopedic". You think you are
buying an orthopedically approved bed for your back. Instead I
learned that this word apparently means absolutely nothing.
Sealy is rife with phony sales jargon, fictitious names for
beds, and not applying any technical criteria to the aspects of
support, firmness, softness, etc.

The proof is that the bed I bought was terrible. And when
I looked to buy a replacement found another person selling his
"Fenway" model online because his doctor told him to stop using
it. He said he needed a bed with more support. No kidding! I
figured that out for myself the first night I slept on mine.

Here is the text of my final letter to Costco.
Sealy, in my opinion, is committing fraud with this
“PosturePedic” trademark name. There is nothing
“PosturePedic” about a sagging, non-supportive mattress
of such obviously cheap quality.
 |

January 12, 2006


Dear Costco Buyers,

I returned the Sealy mattress this week for a refund. It is a
worthless item of poor quality.

Enclosed is an add (from www.craigslist.org) to sell the same
mattress by another disappointed purchaser. Notice that this
person purchased the same model, a “Fenway”, from Costco. Notice
that the person states their doctor advised he stop using it.

 |
| Apparently I'm not the only person to red
flag the Costco "Fenway." |
|

You may think my dissatisfaction with this mattress is unusual,
until you realize that here is evidence of another person making
the same complaint—lack of support—that I did.

Sealy, in my opinion, is committing fraud with this
“PosturePedic” trademark name. There is nothing “PosturePedic”
about a sagging, non-supportive mattress of such obviously cheap
quality.

Costco has been, in my opinion, fooled into thinking that:
1) Sealy is providing a valuable item to Costco members
2) Anything that says “PosturePedic” must offer good back
support

In fact, Sealy is not providing Costco members with any
technical specifications regarding their product. Sealy is
hiding behind descriptive terms like “Pillow top” and “Ultra
Plush”; or “Fenway”, “Sanford”, “Allendale”, and “Guilmont” just
as they are, in my opinion, sliding on the magic of the term “PosturePedic”.

Phony mattress names such as “Fenway”, “Sanford”, “Allendale”,
and “Guilmont” are an old trick used in the bedding industry.
You can read about the reason in the Consumer Reports article on
beds (2004). These totally made up names prevent comparison
shopping. Thus they only mean “name blocked so you don’t know
what you are getting.”

Costco sells many items that display technical specifications;
computers, LCD displays, wide screen TVs, and other household
appliances that cost as much as a mattress & box spring. Yet the
Sealy bed has only phony salesman jargon about “Ultra Plush Euro
Pillowtop”, “Stay True™ SuperSoft convoluted foam” , “Marvelux™
foam”, etc., etc.
Can you imagine if Costco sold a computer that used the
equivalent “salesman’s specifications”? It is absurd to imagine
the hyperbole of an “Allendale PC” with “Super Easy™” operating
system software, “SuperHuge™ hard drive” with “UltraFast™
memory” chips. Say what?

We buy merchandise because the manufacturer lists accurate
technical specifications that allow us to compare one item
against another. Not so in the bedding department.

Are we morons?
Are we to be sheltered from accurate information because we
might not buy the item if Sealy accurately rated/described their
mattress?

For God’s sake! You are Costco! All you have to do is have your
buyers read the Consumer Reports article on mattresses and
anyone with a college education can see there is huge problem in
buying beds!

The furniture industry hides all technical specs and employs
salesmen in showrooms to “push” their product. Consumer Reports
completely missed the mark! They fell into the confusion of
“some people liked this bed and some people hated it.” Notice
that they gave up with the confusion of personal
preferences—they failed to use any objective, scientifically
quantifiable methodology to evaluate a bed!

Obtain the data
Where is the equivalent of the “crash test dummy” in this area?

1) construct a series of dummies with articulating spines
2) include models that span human heights from 5’ to 6’ 4”
3) allow body mass to be added to simulate any weight from 100
to 400lbs.
4) lay these dummies on various mattresses and photograph the
effect from the side of the bed

Display the data as the bed’s “technical specs”
Show photos/graphs, etc. of the effects on different mattresses.
EXAMPLE

A Costco “Fenway” mattress with a 5’, 100 pound “female” dummy
lying on its side:
*How many vertical inches of sink into the mattress?
*How much side-to-side sink (hammock effect) is evidenced?
*How accurately is the spinal column supported (deviation from
normal alignment of a standing individual)?
*How much end-to-end curving is observed (hammock effect)?
*How many pounds of pressure recorded from sensors on the
shoulder, hips, etc.?
*How much effort was required to roll over (pounds of force)

Same mattress with a 6’, 300 pound “male” dummy laying on its
side:
*How many vertical inches of sink into the mattress?
*How much side-to-side sink (hammock effect) is evidenced?
*How accurately is the spinal column supported (deviation from
normal alignment of a standing individual)?
*How much end-to-end curving is observed (hammock effect)?
*How many pounds of pressure recorded from sensors on the
shoulder, hips, etc.?
*How much effort was required to roll over (pounds of force)

Conclusion for the Fenway
Ratings that indicate the estimated suitability of this mattress
for individuals of the various heights, weights and ages. Note
that age is related to sensitivity of pressure—older individuals
require more softness than younger ones do. Obviously a mattress
that supports a 100 pound person 5 feet tall may not be
recommended for a 5’ 7” male who weighs 350 pounds.

END OF EXAMPLE |

This leads to ratings that mean something
With accurate test results such as hypothesized above even
Consumer Reports could have produced a useful article instead of
the generalized confusion that they published.

Softness can be appended
Since support of the spine is one thing and softness another it
should be made clear that a mattress with proper support but
lacking in softness can be made softer by the simple addition of
foam pads placed on top and covered with a mattress pad or
fitted sheets.


What can Costco do?
Insist that Sealy drop all phony salesman jargon and provide
objective data. Rate the mattresses for the weight limits with a
quantifiable methodology to determine “support” and “softness.”
Otherwise Sealy should be sent packing.

I was shocked at how cheap the Fenway mattress was. It is not
surprising therefore that others, like the craigslist.org ad
shows, would want to get rid of this bed. Perhaps others do not
return the bed to Costco because, like the craigslist person,
they don’t know that there is a 2-year return policy with
Costco.

I will bet that if Costco sent a letter to all purchasers of the
Fenway offering a refund that hundreds of these cheap sets would
come back to Costco.

Thank you for being an excellent company that has revolutionized
shopping in too many positive ways to discuss here. I would not
take the time to author all these letters unless I felt that
there was a serious problem that Costco has the power to
correct.

In brief
Beds need to have weight/size limit specifications regarding an
objective standard of spinal support. A bed that hammocks, as
the Fenway does, is NOT “PosturePedic”. Softness is less
significant as it can always be appended with a foam pad, etc.

Sincerely,

Fenway Allendale Robinson

Cc: Scott (Manager) , “Robert” at Sealy
| What did Sealy have to say? |
 |
|
My reply to "Robert" at Sealy |
January 12, 2006

“Robert”
Consumer Services Coordinator
Sealy Company Headquarters
One Office Parkway at Sealy Drive
Trinity, NC 27370

Dear “Robert”,

Your reply to my detailed letter is an insult to
any person with a brain. You said nothing of any
import. Your letter is best categorized as what
it is commonly referred to—bullshit.

Thank you for sending me bullshit in reply to my
serious and intelligent comments. The lack of
awareness your company has displayed is typical
of the dinosaur species of corporations.

You may go back to sleep now. “Robert.”

Sincerely,
Fenway Allendale Robinson

cc: Costco
 |
|

|
| | |